|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Excluder Aortic Endograft
Daniel M. Alterman, MD
and
Scott L. Stevens, MD*
University of Tennesee Medical Center
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Sstevens{at}mc.utmck.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Since its introduction, more than 59 000 patients have been treated with Gore Excluder endoprosthesis (GORE) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in the past 11 years. It has become clearer that differences in device delivery and design provide certain advantages that may favor one anatomical milieu over another. Behavior of the aneurysm sac also seems to be graft dependent as more long-term data become available. The currently available low-permeability GORE seems to have addressed the problem of endotension noted with previous designs. Cumulative data are reviewed, and the data demonstrate very low perioperative morbidity and mortality and excellent protection from aneurysm-related complications with the GORE device. Superior ease of use, excellent trackability, and rare failures requiring acute open conversion characterize the GORE device. By addressing clinical demands of aortic endografting, Gore has eclipsed other endografts in the industry to now dominate the US market. The aim of this review is to describe the history, experience, advantages, and future goals with the GORE for the treatment of AAA.
First published on June 17, 2008, doi:10.1177/1531003508319786
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy 2008;20:136.
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
