SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1531003507310832v1
20/1/95    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Makaroun, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cho, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Makaroun, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Outlook Commentary

Jae Sung Cho, MD* and Michel S. Makaroun, MD

University of Pittsburgh

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: chojs{at}upmc.edu.


   Abstract
Abstract Background: Follow-up survival studies in patients with acute type B aortic dissection have been restricted to a small number of patients in single centers. We used data from a contemporary registry of acute type B aortic dissection to better understand factors associated with adverse long-term survival. Methods and Results: We examined 242 consecutive patients discharged alive with acute type B aortic dissection enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection between 1996 and 2003. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed, and Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of follow-up mortality. Three-year survival for patients treated medically, surgically, or with endovascular therapy was 77.6% ± 6.6%, 82.8% ± 18.9%, and 76.2% ± 25.2%, respectively (median follow-up 2.3 years, log-rank P = .61). Independent predictors of follow-up mortality included female gender (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-3.71; P = .03), a history of prior aortic aneurysm (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.03-4.59; P = .04), a history of atherosclerosis (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.32-4.66; P < .01), in-hospital renal failure (HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.15-5.63; P = .02), pleural effusion on chest radiograph (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.18-5.58; P = .02), and in-hospital hypotension/ shock (HR, 12.5; 95% CI, 3.24-48.21; P < 0.01). Conclusions: Contemporary follow-up mortality in patients who survive to hospital discharge with acute type B aortic dissection is high, approaching 1 in every 4 patients at 3 years. Current treatment and follow-up surveillance require further study to better understand and optimize care for patients with this complex disease.

First published on April 2, 2008, doi:10.1177/1531003507310832

Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy 2008;20:95.

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement