SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shah, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kreienberg, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shah, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kreienberg, P. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Technique of Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy and Contemporary Results

Dhiraj M. Shah, M.D.

Robert P. Leather, M.D.

R. Clement Darling, M.D.

Benjamin B. Chang, M.D.

Philip S.K. Paty, M.D.

Paul B. Kreienberg, M.D.

Eversion endarterectomy (ECEA) of the carotid artery by Debakey et al. in 1959 made eversion of the internal carotid artery difficult and provided limited visualization of the end point of the endarterectomy. In this study we describe the technique of a modified ECEA and report our experience. Between May 1993 and August 1996, 1674 CEAs were performed in 1,391 patients for symptomatic disease or for asymptomatic stenosis (>70%). Preoperative evaluation was performed using duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography, and/or contrast angiography. Procedures were performed preferentially (>97%) under regional cervical block anesthesia in the awake patient. A shunt was used only for intraoperative neurologic deterioration. CEAs performed in patients combined with coronary artery bypass graft were performed under general anesthesia, a shunt was not used routinely in these patients. Data was prospectively collected in a vascular registry. Shunts were placed in 3.4% of ECEA. The operative mortality was 1.2% in the ECEA group and the stroke rate was 0.4% in the ECEA group. Similarly, occlusion rates of 0.4%. Mean follow-up was 7 months (range: 1-48). Postoperatively duplex scans were used to detect stenoses >50%. There was one restenosis (0.09%) at 15 months in the eversion group. There was one asymptomatic occlusion at five months in the ECEA group and two in the SCEA group at six and eight months. Four year cumulative patency rate was 98%. There has been no late stroke in either group on follow-up. The current method of eversion endarterectomy as outlined in our study is safe and reliable for the preservation of neurologic function.

Key Words: Carotid artery • eversion endarterectomy • stroke

Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Vol. 9, No. 2, 49-62 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/153100359800900207


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement