SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeRubertis, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeRubertis, B. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Embolization During Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting : What Is the Optimal Method for Detecting Embolic Debris and Its Sequelae?

Brian G. DeRubertis, MD

UCLA Division of Vascular Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, California, bderubertis{at}mednet.ucla.edu

Although the initial randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) relative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) were favorable for CAS, more recent trials have not been universally supportive and have instead highlighted the fact that patient selection may be the key to reducing poor outcomes following percutaneous carotid intervention. Because adverse neurologic events of sufficient severity to be detected by neurologic exam are rare, it is helpful to have more sensitive surrogates of neurologic outcome, such as neurocognitive testing, transcranial Doppler, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and particulate analysis of captured embolic debris. These techniques allow for the evaluation of embolic phenomenon and its sequelae during CAS, which is likely responsible for the majority of adverse neurologic outcomes with this new modality. By correlating the data gathered by these techniques with the perioperative patient, lesion, or device characteristics in those undergoing CAS, one may ultimately be able to better identify and avoid percutaneous treatment in patients who are at heightened risk of embolic phenomenon and adverse clinical outcomes.

Key Words: carotid artery stent • endarterectomy • treatment • indications • embolic debris • diffusion-weighted MRI

Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Vol. 20, No. 3, 260-269 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1531003508323729


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement