This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kalra, M. Articles by Gloviczki, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kalra, M. Articles by Gloviczki, P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Fifteen Years Ago Laser was Supposed to Open Arteries, Now it is Supposed to Close Veins: What is the Reality Behind the Tool?

Peter Gloviczki, MD

Rochester MN

Laser first emerged as a technology for use in the vascular arena nearly 20 years ago. The ability of laser to evaporate atherosclerotic plaque was extensively studied; however, the goal of creation of an adequate channel without arterial wall perforation proved to be elusive, and the technique fell into disfavor. More than a decade later, interest in lasers was sparked again with its application to endovenous thermal ablation of axial superficial venous reflux. The mechanism of action of endovenous laser therapy involves thermal damage of the vein wall, resulting in destruction of the intima and collagen denaturation of the media with eventual fibrotic occlusion of the vein. Apart from the obvious attraction of a minimally invasive procedure to ablate superficial venous reflux with its attendant benefits, another advantage of laser ablation includes a potentially decreased incidence of neovascularization in the groin secondary to preservation of superficial venous drainage of the abdominal wall. Early success in terms of ablation of the refluxing saphenous vein has been reported as 90% to 95%. Minor complications are reported in 3% to 10% of patients and include bruising around the puncture site, transient paresthesias, superficial phlebitis, and skin burns or pigmentation. The more serious complications of deep venous thrombosis or extension of thrombus into the femoral vein have been variously reported in 0% to 2.3% of limbs treated. Pulmonary embolism is extremely rare. There is a learning curve, with a decrease in the incidence of all complications with experience. The importance of detailed preoperative and intraoperative duplex ultrasound examination cannot be overemphasized. The identification of all refluxing venous segments and their ablation is the key to optimizing the rate of successful ablation to 97% at 1 year and minimizing recurrence of varicose veins. With encouraging early and mid-term results with endovenous laser therapy, future developments in this field must mandate standardization of technical aspects, follow-up imaging, and reporting.

Key Words: endovenous laser therapy • superficial venous reflux • atherosclerotic plaque

Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Vol. 18, No. 1, 3-8 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/153100350601800102


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Pleister, J. Evans, P. S. Vaccaro, and B. Satiani Natural History of the Great Saphenous Vein Stump Following Endovenous Laser Therapy Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, August 1, 2008; 42(4): 348 - 351. [Abstract] [PDF]