This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rubin, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rubin, B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Debate: Midwestern Vascular Surgery Society Meeting, September 10, 2004, Omaha, Nebraska

Section of Vascular Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

This article is the result of a debate. The motion proposed was "Infrainguinal endovascular procedures should be reserved for patients who do not have good open surgical options." Arguments in favor of the motion were offered by Daniel J. Reddy of Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Ml, and arguments against the motion were offered by Peter Kalman of Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, IL.

Key Words: infrainguinal endovascular procedures • open surgery

Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Vol. 17, No. 3, 237-244 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/153100350501700314


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?