SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elkouri, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chbat, N. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Elkouri, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chbat, N. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Minimally Invasive Vascular Surgery and the Evolution of Vascular Anastomosis Techniques

Stephane Elkouri

Division of Vascular Surgery, Section of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn

Peter Gloviczki

Division of Vascular Surgery, Section of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn

Nicholas W. Chbat

Division of Vascular Surgery, Section of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn

The evolution of vascular surgery toward minimally invasive approaches appears to be inevitable. Thus, innovative and reliable minimally invasive anastomosis techniques are needed to facilitate minimally invasive vascular surgery. Current endovascular anastomosis techniques are limited by their reliance on suitable arteries for access and attachment. Their dependency on the fate of the arterial attachment sites is greater than for the conventionally sutured anastomosis. These limitations will be difficult to over come. Videoscopic anastomosis techniques may offer both the advantages of endovascular surgery in terms of rapid postoperative recovery and reliability of open-sutured anastomosis. With improved training and instrumentation, such as robots, semiautomatic or automatic anastomotic devices, the video scopic approaches will likely become technically easier. The chief disadvan tage of current open-sutured anastomoses is the invasive exposure required, elevated morbidity and mortality, and associated prolonged hospital stay and convalescence period. Development of automatic or semiautomatic anastomosis techniques could decrease the invasiveness of these operations. Further research will help understand the interaction of the artificial agents with the arterial wall and will define what constitutes a perfect and durable anastomosis. This, in turn, will allow for the ideal anastomosis technique to become reality, and for widespread application of minimally invasive approaches in vascular surgery.

Key Words: Anastomosis • vascular • automated • endovascular • videoscopic

Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Vol. 15, No. 2, 127-153 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/153100350201500208


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement