SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Green, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Patient Selection for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Richard M. Green, M.D.

Division of Vascular Surgery. University of Rochester. Rochester NY

Indications for endovascular aneurysm repair cannot be considered absolute. Patient selection depends on the availability of product, the skills and experience of the implant team, and the anatomy and overall condition of the patient. It is unclear if these procedures should be offered to all those with large aneurysms, restricted to high-risk or low-risk patients, or offered to patients with smaller aneurysms not currently considered for operation. More patients will be suitable as more devices become available, skills improve, sheath sizes decrease, and long-term data showing efficacy become available. Significant anatomic factors affecting patient selection include the length, shape, and angulation of the infrarenal neck, any involvement of the common iliac arteries with either aneurysmal or occlusive disease, occlusive disease or marked tortuosity of the ileofemoral access vessels, or intrinsically small iliac arteries.

Early results indicate that the procedure is at least as safe as conventional repair, and patients can return to normal activities sooner. What we do not know is whether the natural history of aneurysms (i.e., death from rupture) is altered by an endovascular device. We are just learning the failures modes, and some were not anticipated in the design phase. We do not know if progressive dilatation of the attachments sites and aneurysm remodeling will result in device migration but the US IDE experience and reports from Europe suggest that these phenomena will occur. Our early experience suggests that we should avoid endografting in young, otherwise healthy patients with long life expectancies.

Key Words: Patient selection • endovascular repair

Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1-13 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/153100350101400202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement