SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, D.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, D.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, M. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Popliteal Artery Aneurysms: Is Endovascular Reconstruction Durable?

David Rosenthal, M.D.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Georgia Baptist Medical Center, Medical College of Georgia, Atlanta, GA

John H. Matsuura, M.D.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Georgia Baptist Medical Center, Medical College of Georgia, Atlanta, GA

Michael D. Clark, M.D.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Georgia Baptist Medical Center, Medical College of Georgia, Atlanta, GA

This initial series describes a minimally invasive, endovascular method of performing femoropopliteal in situ saphenous vein (SV) bypass and popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) embolization. Twenty patients have undergone PAA operations. Eleven patients had conventional SV bypasses with proximal and distal ligation of the popliteal artery (PA), and nine patients underwent PAA embolization and an endovascular in situ SV bypass (EISB). The EISB bypass was performed using an angioscopic guided side branch occlusion coil system, whereas the PAAs were embolized with occlusion coils under fluoroscopic surveillance. After operation in the EISB group there were no deaths, no wound complications, and the mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was 2.1 days. Six operations were performed through two incisions, and three operations required an additional incision. Primary patency was 88% (8/9), and all PAAs remained occluded by color flow ultrasonography at follow-up ranging from 4 to 23 months (mean 11.2 months). In the conventional bypass group there were no deaths, three patients (27%) had wound complications, and the mean LOS was 6.2 days. Bypass patency at 42 months was 91% (10/11). This minimally invasive combined radiological and endovascular surgical technique obviates an extensive incision to harvest the SV and ligate the PAA proximally and distally If long-term endovascular bypass graft patency and PAA occlusion rates prove to be similar to open operative results, the benefits of reduced wound complications, decreased hospital LOS, and increased health care savings support further investigation of this endovascular method for the treatment of PAA.

Key Words: Endovascular treatment • popliteal artery aneurysms

Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Vol. 12, No. 2, 55-62 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/153100350001200211


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement