This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Aburahma, A. F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Aburahma, A. F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Lumbar Sympathectomy: Historical Perspective and Current Role

Charleston Area Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center of West Virginia University, Charleston, WV

Lumbar sympathectomy continues to be controversial. It is probably a useful procedure for selected patients with advanced peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Although it is most appropriate for patients with causalgia or hyperhidrosis, some patients with nonbypassable atherosclerotic occlusion with rest pain or limited necrosis are said to benefit from lumbar sympathectomy Some surgeons perform sympathectomy for patients with multisegmental arterial occlusive disease undergoing aortoiliac reconstruction or for those with a history of the "blue toe" syndrome. Although much of the increased blood flow associated with this procedure may pass through arteriovenous shunts, some nutrient blood flow may occur. Both clinical judgment and noninvasive diagnostic techniques—particularly digital photoplethysmography-are important for selecting patients who may benefit from lumbar sympathectomy Patients with early foot ischemic rest pain and ischemic ulcers or gangrene limited to the toes or the distal forefoot have been considered candidates. However, sympathectomy may be unnecessary if distal revascularization is possible. Although most procedures are still done conventionally, increasing numbers of studies report good results using laparoscopic techniques. Between 50 and 75% of selected patients may notice subjective and objective improvement after operation.

Key Words: Lumbar sympathectomy

Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Vol. 11, No. 1, 89-112 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/153100359901100111


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?