SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Archie, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Archie, J. P., JR
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Carotid Patching: What is the Optimum Patch Material?

Joseph P. Archie, JR

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC

A growing body of evidence indicates that obligatory or highly frequent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patch reconstruction gives superior peri operative and late outcomes. With average combined perioperative stroke and mortality rates for CEA in the 5 to 6% range, the 3 to 4% improvement in this outcome offered by patching is clinically highly significant. A major unanswered question is which patch material or materials provide the optimal protection against perioperative stroke and restenosis. Only two prospective randomized studies contain two or more carotid patch materials, and, like nonrandomized reports containing two or more patch materials, the sample sizes are too small to draw accurate statistical conclusions. This problem is circumvented by an infor mal meta analysis of pooled data from published reports containing outcomes for CEA patch reconstruction with two or more of the following materials: autolo gous greater saphenous vein, everted or double-layered cervical vein, Dacron, and polytetrafloroethylene (PTFE). The results indicate that saphenous vein is the best CEA patch material in terms of the two major end points—perioperative stroke and restenosis. However, everted cervical vein gives outcomes that are almost as good as saphenous vein. The synthetics Dacron and PTFE are clearly inferior to saphenous vein, with Dacron being the poorest performing commonly used CEA patch material. The best possible perioperative and long-term outcomes for CEA are most likely to be obtained with complete internal CEA end points and highly frequent patch reconstructions with autologous greater saphenous veins.

Key Words: Carotid endarterectomy • carotid patch • saphenous vein patch

Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Vol. 10, No. 2, 111-118 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/153100359901000214


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement