SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beebe, H. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kritpracha, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Beebe, H. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kritpracha, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Surgery for Acute Stroke: Current Status

Hugh G. Beebe

Jobst Vascular Center, Toledo, OH, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI

Boonprasit Kritpracha

Department of Vascular Surgery, Songkla University, Hat-Yai, Songkla, Thailand, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Jobst Vascular Center, Toledo, OH

Although investigations regarding surgery for acute ischemic stroke span 4 decades, the topic remains controversial. This review considers emergency carotid surgery for acute stroke from four perspectives: an operation attempting to reverse an acute neurological deficit, an operation soon after acute stroke to prevent further neurologic deficit, reoperative surgery for acute neurological deficit early after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and management of severe carotid stenosis after successful thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. The available clinical data are absent or incomplete for each of these unusual aspects of carotid surgery. In the absence of a badly needed ran domized trial, case selection is important and should be accompanied by a proven record of successful, low-morbidity, elective carotid surgery before undertaking more controversial indications. Delaying CEA for 4 to 6 weeks after stroke has repeatedly been shown to be unnecessary and to increase risk of interval new stroke. Finally, the impact of new thrombolytic treatment upon reoperative surgery for complications of CEA and for planning semielective reconstructive surgery needs to be considered.

Key Words: Stroke • carotid endarterectomy • thrombosis

Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Vol. 10, No. 1, 85-93 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/153100359901000111


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement